![]() ![]() Richard Blumenthal, another co-author, said that in drafting the bill, the Senate Judiciary Committee heard about numerous examples of platforms, including Twitter and Reddit, that allegedly did not act to remove child pornography despite being notified about it. Lindsey Graham, a co-author of the bill, said during Thursday’s committee meeting. “Our goal is to tell the social media companies, ‘Get involved and stop this crap, and if you don’t take responsibility for what’s on your platform, then Section 230 will not be there for you,’” Sen. ![]() It’s a carrot-and-stick approach that effectively tells websites how they may, as the bill’s name implies, earn their liability protections. The bill also seeks to establish a commission, led by federal law enforcement, charged with publishing voluntary best practices for tech platforms on how to combat child pornography. Tech platforms can already face criminal prosecution at the federal level for knowingly facilitating the spread of child pornography, but the legislation goes further, making it possible for states to bring civil and criminal suits on the matter, too. Parents of the social media generation are not OKīy narrowing Section 230’s scope, the latest bill seeks to create more legal exposure for companies that fail to do enough to remove child sexual abuse material (CSAM).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |